Minutes of the work session of the Georgetown Township Planning Commission held Wednesday, January 6, 1999
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Honderd at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Honderd, Jansma, DeGood, Poskey, Huizinga, Noe
Absent: Holtvluwer
The work session, which formulated the agenda for December 16, 1998, included the following items to be placed on the agenda, discussion, and action:
II. Approval of minutes of the December 16, 1998 regular meeting and the
January 6, 1999 work session meeting
III. Unfinished Business
A. (SUP9824) Sunset Manor, 725 Baldwin St., is requesting permission to have a convalescent home/housing for the elderly, under Sections 8.3(D), 10.3(A) and 9.3(B), on parcels of land described as P.P.# 70-14-14-280-005, -006, -007, -013, -014, -011; and 70-14-13-100-087, & -037, in (LDR) Low Density Residential and (MHR) Medium/High Density Residential Districts, located at 7684, 7672, 7656, 7644, and 7638 Sally Dr., and 815, 725, and 795 Baldwin St.
Steve Witte represented the applicant and stated that Sunset Manor had applied for a variance for density. The request will be on the Zoning Board of Appeals agenda on January 27, 1999.
IV. New Business
The applicant explained that the requested addition would be for educational purposes. The addition will be one story with identical details as the original building. He said that the addition will cut into the parking area, but parking spaces will be relocated. He said they decided against the lane to Bauer Road and the bituminous drive will be eliminated.
Some items not provided on the site plan include: structures, drives and parking areas within 100 feet of the site; elevations; what is existing and proposed on the site; pavement width; existing land use; ; landscaping along the west property line to screen the parking area as proposed in Sec. 3.11A; trash receptacle; signs; and fences and walls.
It was noted that the addition would be hooked to existing utilities and have city water. There will be a well for irrigation. Parking is shown as setback 20 feet and 25 feet is required. The 20-foot proposed extension is not increasing the nonconformity. It was noted that the number of parking spaces lost should be shown as compared to the number added. The current trash receptacle will
have to be relocated and should be shown. The driveway is in the setback line and evergreen trees need to screen parking area. The Planning Commission can waive some of the requirements.
This is an addition to an existing plan. Some items missing from the plan include: legal description; parcel size; typical floor plan; elevations; exterior lighting; and landscaping. The proposed street extension is 930 feet and every 900 feet emergency vehicle turn-arounds are required. The plan needs to show where the road ties in with another road. There was a discussion that this plan should come under the private street section of the ordinance.
The lot is flat and vacant. The proposed building is similar to other Metropolitan Hospital clinics. Parking is proposed on the south and east sides. The landscape plan shows green space and a berm with pine trees along the east parking area.
Some items missing from the plan include: structures, drives and parking within 100 feet of the site; dimensions of the sign; pavement width; building elevations; height and type of lighting fixtures; landscaping by the street does not meet the ordinance requirement of Sec. 3.11B; 16 trees are required; land between the parking lot and homes does not meet the ordinance requirement; floor plan; and number of examining rooms. Barrier free parking spaces need to be moved. Parking spaces are shown as 9 X 20 feet. Members of the Planning Commission stated a preference to have only one driveway.
B. Public Hearings
Mark Schmidtke represented Holy Redeemer Parish and stated that the addition was requested to accommodate classrooms, activities room and offices because the church is growing. The proposed addition is 22,000 square feet and the project will include remodeling. The sanctuary is not being increased. Parking will be added as a convenience to access the new addition. The applicant stated that the classrooms are being used as various times in shifts. He said the addition would fit in the back corner of the site. He said a buffer would be maintained. Screen plantings along the south property line will buffer the area from neighbors. He said they have talked to the neighbors and tried to accommodate their input. He said that they tried to save as many trees as possible. The trash receptacle is screened. Storm water drains in the front yard. Drainage from the new addition area will be taken underground to the detention areas that are currently used. One light fixture will be added.
Some items missing from the site plan include: all structures, drives and parking within 100 feet of the site; isle widths; street pavement width; existing adjacent land uses; percentage of classrooms and multi-purpose room; height of new addition; elevations; and floor plans. Maximum permitted height of the light pole is 25 feet, 30 feet is shown. More trees are needed to screen parking areas from neighbors. Lots 2 through 5 should have a green belt. The Planning Commission can waive some requirements.
The applicant said that the multi-purpose room is about 40 to 50 % of the addition.
Some items not shown on the plan include: location sketch; parcel size; building setback lines of one building; streets, drives and parking within 100 feet of the site; drives, parking and isle dimensions; and zoning and land use of abutting parcels. It was noted that the vehicle repair would be done by appointment and there will be no outdoor storage other than vehicles dropped off. Six-inch curbing is required for the perimeter of the paved area. Members of the Planning Commission stated that they would like to receive a total count of parking spaces being used and those available each time an applicant comes in for the Burman Building.
The proposed 10,330 square foot building will seat 100 members and will be located on a 13.29 acre site in the LDR district. The Meadowbrook Drain goes through the property. The church will be east of the drain. There will be public water and sewer. There will be drives onto 44th St. and 8th Ave., which have been approved by the Road Commission. A detention basin will accommodate storm water.
Some items missing from the site plan include: landscaping along 44th St.; structures, drives and parking within 100 feet; trash receptacle; flood plain notations; pavement width of 18th Ave., plant material; and walls or fences; streetscape. There should be 1 tree for every 25 feet on 44th St., which equals 25 trees. A decel land on 44th St. is recommended. There was discussion regarding moving the 44th St. driveway to the west and omitting the drive on 44th St. The setback on 8th Ave. is shown incorrectly. Trees are shown in the future right-of-way.
The request is to have truck parking and container storage on an asphalt lot surrounded by a 6 foot chain link fence. Drainage and catch basins lead to the storm sewer. Some items missing from the site plan include: existing land uses of adjacent parcels; and no detail on fencing. It was recommended that the height of the berm be increased and landscaping be added.
The applicant said that the proposed building was for an ice cream and sandwich shop. Two drives are shown. The site plan in incomplete because survey information was not provided. The two drives and parking lots are not recommended. The streetscape and landscaping along Oakwood Dr. do not meet the ordinance. Some items missing from the plan include: adjacent land use; roadway width; public utilities. It was noted that there was not enough information to review the plan. Both drives exit onto a residential street; however, there could be a problem with exiting onto Cottonwood because of traffic coming around the corner. The width of Cottonwood is shown incorrectly. It was noted that this area should be developed as one site.
The request is for an addition to an existing building. There is an access drive to Rosewood. The doors are for concrete trucks to pull straight through.
The question was raised as to the exact use on the property. It appears to be a contractors yard and building storage area, which is not a permitted use in this district. The use needs to be determined. It will not be permitted if it is non-conforming.
Some items missing from the plan include: streets, drives and parking with 100 feet; trash receptacle; drives and parking areas are not dimensioned; dimensions of parking spaces; and topography.
A concern was raised because of the close proximity to a residential area. As shown, the parking spaces require the drive to back onto Rosewood and this is not permitted. Loading is not permitted in the front yard. Parking should be moved to the west side of the building and the gravel drive to the west side should be paved.
Don VanDyke read a memo to the Planning Commission.
It was noted that the extra drive should not be allowed onto Rosewood.
4. Private Streets-none
A. Election of Officers
Moved by Jim Jansma, seconded by Noe, to leave the officers the same: Chairman-Greg Honderd; Vice Chairman Jim Jansma; Secretary-Cornelius Huizinga
MOTION CARRIED.
VI. Commissioner Comments
VII. Staff Comments